The “Trump Problem,” War, and the Honorable
Peter Schultz
From Caroline Elkins' book, Legacy of Violence: “the English temperament [embraced]
sanctimonious self-righteousness which … indulged in injustice and selfish
spoliation … under a cloak of virtue, benevolence, and unselfish altruism.”
[212, Elkins]
What’s the Trump problem? How should he be understood? Is the most problematic
thing his being anti-democratic or is it his being sanctimoniously
self-righteous, embracing injustice and cruelty under the cloak of virtue and
justice? The critique of Trump as being anti-democratic is a partisan critique.
He doesn’t support democratic policies. The latter though is less superficial,
less partisan than the former. It cuts deeper, revealing roots of American
politics that are beyond partisanship and more problematic. For both party
elites, a sanctimonious self-righteousness is a sign and a source of virtue, of
patriotism, of being a good American. California’s governor Newsom is as
self-righteously sanctimonious as Trump. And that sanctimonious self-righteousness
is the most problematic characteristic of our political order, not
partisanship. A partisan critique of Trump does not cut deeply enough to reveal
the most problematic characteristic of the American political order.
Hugo: War “is the second and more powerful of the two normal means employed the
governments to achieve the ends [desired]. Diplomacy is the other means, but
diplomacy by itself would be weak and ineffectual; war is its reinforcement,
its sanction, and its alternative.” But diplomacy doesn’t have the same moral
appeal that war has. War is taken as a sign and a source of virtue, of
righteousness because when you’re willing to kill human beings, you know and
have proof that you’re righteous. Killing is proof or your righteousness. Thus,
such killing has “a moral effect” and is universally praised.
“Honor killings, often thought of by Americans as the practice of primitive
societies, are engaged in by US elites as well. And so it is little wonder that
persons seeking to be honorable are attracted to, seduced by war, especially
patriotic wars. And, so, the distance between the Boy Scouts and war, for
example, isn’t all that far.”
Addendum: There are those who seek to be honorable and there are those who seek
to be honored. For the latter being honorable is not enough. They need to be
honored as well. Those seeking the honorable and those seeking to be honored
are very different beings, and lead to very different ways of being in the
world, e.g., the life of the good person and the life of the good citizen. For
the ambitious, being honorable is not as important as being honored. And the
most ambitious may be said to lust after fame because they see it as a kind of
immortality. And on that quest, the honorable will often need to be and often
will be sacrificed.
No comments:
Post a Comment